Refinery's sulfur removers are
blamed for tainted gas
Cause of malfunction still
baffling Shell
Friday, September 03, 2004
By Keith Darcé
Business writer
A pair of units designed to
remove sulfur from gasoline during
the refining process paradoxically
were to blame for creating a batch
of sulfur-tainted gasoline at a
Norco refinery in May, one of the
refinery's owners said this week.
The bad gasoline damaged more
than 80,000 fuel gauges in cars and
trucks in Louisiana and Florida.
The sulfur-removing units began
operating at the Motiva Norco
Refining plant on May 4 and 6, about
two weeks before motorists in the
New Orleans area started reporting
fuel gauge problems, said Shawn
Frederick, a spokesman for Shell Oil
Products, the refinery's U.S. owner.
In addition to the elemental
sulfur that previously had been
detected in the bad gas, Shell now
says the tainted fuel also contained
hydrogen sulfide, an extremely
corrosive compound that occurs
naturally in "sour" crude oil.
More than 200 gas stations mostly
operating under the Shell, Texaco
and Chevron brands sold the tainted
fuel in the New Orleans area in May.
The gas was a problem in some
vehicles with silver electrical
contacts in their fuel-gauge sensor
units that sit in gas tanks. The
elemental sulfur and hydrogen
sulfide can corrode the silver
contacts and cause a false reading
in the dashboard fuel gauge. Some
motorists ran out of gas while
driving, even though their gas gauge
indicated they had plenty of fuel.
Shell has processed about 53,000
broken fuel gauge claims in
Louisiana and about 28,000 in
Florida, totaling 81,000, Frederick
said.
He couldn't say how much money
the company has paid out in claims.
Considering that each broken
gauge can cost from $200 to $1,000
to fix depending on the car model,
Shell's cost for the repairs thus
far could be in the tens of millions
of dollars.
Though the company has traced the
problem to the new refining units,
the exact reason why the units
malfunctioned remains a mystery,
Frederick said.
"The precise technical reasons
for the appearance of minute amounts
of elemental sulfur and hydrogen
sulfide continue to be
investigated," he said.
One of the units has been
modified and returned to operation,
while the other remains off-line
awaiting repairs, Frederick said.
The units were installed at
Motiva to meet new federal
environmental regulations that limit
sulfur levels in gas to 30 parts per
million. The new rules go into
effect Jan. 1.
Current rules limit sulfur levels
in gas to 300 parts per million.
The new sulfur-removing units
process about 60,000 barrels of gas
per day, about 25 percent of the
refinery's total capacity.
Though questions remain about the
tainted fuel problem, Frederick
said, Motiva has added safety
measures to prevent the mishap from
recurring.
"We do know how to prevent a
similar reoccurrence, and our
customers can be confident that our
gasoline manufactured at the Motiva
Norco Refinery will not interact
with silver gas gauge sensors," he
said.
One precautionary measure
involved subjecting samples of gas
to a so-called silver strip test, a
rarely used test that can detect
tiny levels of corrosive sulfur.
Motiva and other U.S. refineries
commonly use copper strip tests to
detect corrosive material in fuel,
but that test is less precise,
Frederick said.
Copper strip tests were performed
on the batch of tainted gas before
the fuel left the Norco refinery but
they gave no indication of corrosive
sulfur.
When the fuel was retested with
copper strips several days later,
after the fuel gauge problem
surfaced, the results indicated the
presence of a corrosive substance.
Several theories could explain
the conflicting copper strip test
results. The initial tests at the
refinery might have been flawed. The
gas might have picked up trace
amounts of sulfur in transit to the
Kenner fuel terminal where it was
stored before being trucked to
stations. Or something else might
have caused benign sulfur compounds
in the fuel to undergo a chemical
change.
Frederick said the explanation
remains elusive.
"We continue to investigate the
reason for the discrepancy between
the tests," he said.